Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Ackarman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1905No. 14,388Published

Error from Chautauqua district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Per curiam

The certificate of the trial judge that the suit involves the tax law of the state is not binding on this court. (Railroad Co. v. Morasch, 60 Kan. 251, 56 Pac. 133.) An investigation of the question presented to the court below shows that the tax laws of the state were not involved in the suit. There being less than $100 in controversy, the proceeding in error is dismissed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erb v. MoraschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899