Gene H. Yamagata v. the United States 07-698t and
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This consolidated tax case turns on whether Forever Living Products Japan (“FLPJ”) 1 was properly characterized as an “association,” and thus correctly taxed as a corporation under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) for the 1991-1996 tax years. Plaintiffs Rex Maughan (“Maughan”) and Ruth Maughan, husband and wife (“the Maughan’s”), and Gene Yamagata (“Yamagata”), both 50% stockholders, 2 treated FLPJ as a corporation when they initially filed their returns for tax years 1991 through 1996. Plaintiffs now claim that agreements into which they entered during the early…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duffy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Free-Pacheco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Maimonides Medical Center v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022