Legal Opinion

Gene H. Yamagata v. the United States 07-698t and

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 6, 2014No. 07-698T and 07-704T CONSOLIDATEDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This consolidated tax case turns on whether Forever Living Products Japan (“FLPJ”) 1 was properly characterized as an “association,” and thus correctly taxed as a corporation under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) for the 1991-1996 tax years. Plaintiffs Rex Maughan (“Maughan”) and Ruth Maughan, husband and wife (“the Maughan’s”), and Gene Yamagata (“Yamagata”), both 50% stockholders, 2 treated FLPJ as a corporation when they initially filed their returns for tax years 1991 through 1996. Plaintiffs now claim that agreements into which they entered during the early…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duffy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Free-Pacheco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Maimonides Medical Center v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API