Legal Opinion
Arnold v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-01013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
544 So.2d 294 (1989)
J. Frank ARNOLD, III, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-01013.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 26, 1989.
Chris M. Pratt of Pratt, Rhyne & Lipinski, Palmetto, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
THREADGILL, Judge.
The appellant, Frank Arnold, pled nolo contendere to possession of cocaine, specifically reserving his right to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress. We agree that the motion should have been granted and therefore reverse the conviction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kehoe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- G.J.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Currens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Charlton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Pedro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991