Legal Opinion

Randich v. Pirtano Const. Co., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 2004No. 2 -02-0816PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

This appeal arises from the dismissal of the amended complaint filed by plaintiff, Todd Randieh, against defendants, Pirtano Construction Company, Inc. (Pirtano), and Utility Constructors, Inc. (Utility), alleging negligence and willful and wanton misconduct. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The trial court dismissed plaintiffs amended complaint under section 2 — 619(a)(9) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619(a)(9) (West 2000)). Accordingly, the well-pleaded facts from the amended complaint are accepted as true. Zimmerman v. Fasco Mills Co., 302 Ill. App. 3d…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. LaFever v. Kemlite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Esser v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Court v. GrzelinskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lazenby v. Mark's Construction, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Rusch v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Kapherr v. MFG Chemical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Knight v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  5. Lurgio v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API