Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2016No. 16-16865Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomas, Chief Judge

FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, AND MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, join:

I agree that this appeal should be reheard en banc for the reasons stated in my dissent. Feldman v. Arizona Sec’y of State, 842 F.3d 613, 628-41, 2016 WL 6472060, at *10-21 (9th Cir. 2016) (Thomas, J., dissenting). The issues presented are important for both the present and future elections.

However, I would hold argument and decide the appeal prior to the certification of results for the present election. As I explained in my dissent, qualified voters have been, and will continue to be, disenfranchised by Arizona’s refusal to count…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API