Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wellington

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875Published

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene county, reversing a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, recovered in a justice’s court.. A short summons was issued in this action upon the following affidavit: Geeene County, ss.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene county, reversing a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, recovered in a justice’s court.. A short summons was issued in this action upon the following affidavit: Geeene County, ss. George Clark being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he has, as he believes, a good cause of action arising on contract against Isaac B. Wellington, who is a resident of the city of New York, upon which, according to the provisions of the thirty-first section of the act'to abolish imprisonment for debt and to punish fraudulent debtors, no warrant can issue…

1Opinion of the Court

Bookies, J.:

The plaintiff’s affidavit contained, as we think, all that was necessary to obtain a short summons. It stated that he had, as he believed, a good cause of action against the defendant arising on contract, “ upon which, according to' the provisions of the thirty-first section of the act to abolish imprisonment for debt and to punish fraudulent debtors, no warrant could issue ; ” and further, that both plaintiff and defendant were non-residents of the county. It is conceded that all requisite formalities were observed to‘authorize the proceeding by short process, in case it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waters v. WhitamoreNew York Supreme Court · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API