Legal Opinion

Mechler v. Dehn

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

A dispute as to the location of the boundary line between plaintiffs’ and defendants’ properties in this ejectment action arises from the fact that the former owner of the entire tract thought there was a greater frontage in the block than in fact there was. In 1881 a party named Morton, owning a tract of land at Middle Village, Queens county, caused a map to be made plotting it into lots. Ten years later this map was filed in the clerk’s office. The map shows some 500 lots or more. From it it is evident that it was the intention to, wherever possible, create lots regular in shape with a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clayton v. FeigIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Pereles v. MagoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Coppin v. MansonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Booth v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Pereles v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mechler v. DehnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Coop v. George A. Lowe Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API