Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Michael W.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 2016No. B269429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, Acting P.J.—

Michael W. (Father) appeals from an order of the juvenile court on his pehtion under Welfare and Institutions Code section 3881 giving his minor son, Korbin Z. (Korbin), sole discretion whether Father will have visits with him. Korbin (the sole respondent on appeal)2 contends that Father had no right to visitation under the circumstances of this case, and that therefore it was not improper to delegate to Korbin the decision whether he will visit with Father.

As we explain below, we conclude that where, as here, the court has not ordered reunification services…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. A.B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. In Re Corrine W.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Hunter S.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Alameda County Social Services Agency v. S.O.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Fresno County Department of Social Services v. Monica G.California Court of Appeal · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Cnty. Dep't of Family v. M.D. (In re J.P.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Y.Q. (In re Western), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. In re I.J. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. In re Kayla W.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. In re L.L. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API