Legal Opinion
Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 1, 2014No. Nos. 14-433, 13-1409PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Judge.
| r This ⅛ a suit for damages resulting from a total knee replacement in which one component of a two-part interlocking knee implant device was not the proper size. The.plaintiffs filed a writ application after no action was taken in the trial court on a Motion to Substitute Counsel and Motion for Recusal they filed. They filed this appeal after their claims against the defendants were dismissed on summary judgment. The writ application was consolidated with this appeál. For the reasons that follow, we find no error with the trial court’s failure to act on the Motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Supreme Services v. Sonny Greer, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. GovernmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D & D Drilling & Exploration, Inc. v. XTO Energy, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Brett Reed v. George RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- D & D Drilling & Exploration, Inc. v. Xto Energy, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, Robert Harris, John DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.