LaFountain v. Estate of Kelly

In the instant case appellant raises two issues with regard to the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint with prejudice. She first argues that the trial court erred in dismissing Counts I and III of her complaint on the ground that the lease *504renewal option on which the claims were based was not enforceable. We affirm the trial court’s action as explained below. We also affirm with regard to appellant’s second issue without further discussion.

In 1981 appellant entered into a ten-year lease agreement with Kelly for property on which appellant owned and operated a restaurant. Paragraph 2 of…