Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2015No. A15A1491Published

1DissentDillard, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The trial court erred in denying GGS’s motion for directed verdict because, contrary to the majority’s holding, J. B. could not prove liability by negligence per se or professional negligence for the reasons set forth infra.(a) Negligence Per Se. I disagree that GGS could, under the facts of this case, be liable for negligence per se by its violation of OCGA § 43-11-21.1, which regulates the administration of deep sedation and general anesthesia. In pertinent part, OCGA § 43-11-21.1 prohibits dentists from “administer [ing] general anesthesia on an outpatient *428basis…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Cowart v. WidenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Bradley Center, Inc. v. WessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API