Legal Opinion
Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Klots Throwing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 13, 1909No. 203PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Circuit Judge.
The amended complaint states two causes of action of which the -following is a summary of the first :(1) The defendant made and delivered to the Regenerated Cold Air Company this instrument:
“83,166.00/100. New York, January 15th, 1906.
“Six months after date we promise to pay to the order of Regenerated Cold Air Co. thirty-one hundred and sixty-six 00/100 dollars at 487 Broadway, N. Y. City, with interest at 6% per annum. Value received, subject to terms of contract between maker and payee of Oct. 25th, 1905.
“No. -. Due July 15th/06. Klots Throwing Co.,
“II. D. Klots,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Sheppard Investment Co. v. RoscoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1929