Printing Services of Greensboro, Inc. v. American Capital Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGeer, Judge
I concur with the majority’s holding regarding the motion for change of venue. Because, however, I believe the Loan Broker Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 66-106 through -117 (2005), only operates to protect natural persons, I would reverse the judgment of the trial court awarding the corporate plaintiff summary judgment. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the remaining portions of the majority opinion.
The critical question on appeal is whether defendant is a “loan broker” within the meaning of the Loan Broker Act. That Act defines loan broker as follows:
A “loan broker” is any person, firm, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Union Ex Rel. Maxwell v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.