Legal Opinion

German Exchange Bank v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

I think that this action, which is one of strict interpleader, is well brought. It is supposed by the counsel for some of the defendants that a bank cannot maintain such action, but must unalterably respond to the person who made the deposit. But it will be found, upon examina*188tion, that a bank is not precluded from bringing such action when conflicting claims are made to moneys or property held by it on deposit; but, otherwise, upon general principles of equity jurisprudence, a bank may be entitled to relief by a bill of interpleader against separate and adversary claims of parties to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bedell v. HoffmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  2. Marvin v. EllwoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  3. Lund v. Seamen's Bank for SavingsNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Swartwout v. President of the Mechanics' BankNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  2. Wells v. Corn Exchange BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  3. White v. Bank of AngolaNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ellicott Paint Co. v. Buffalo Evening News, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Crane v. McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API