Legal Opinion

Wojtusiak v. Elardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated July 25, 2006, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiff to answer certain deposition questions and provide authorizations to obtain records regarding her prior treatment for drug addiction, anorexia, and depression.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to compel the plaintiff to answer certain deposition questions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Calendar v. MnasinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Mayer v. 486 Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rothstein v. Chihee HuhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Quinones v. 9 East 69th Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. McFarlane v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API