Legal Opinion

Little Rock School District v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1978No. 78-137PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Howard, Jr., Justice.

This appeal involves an action, instituted in the Pulaski Circuit Court, by the Little Rock School District for breach of both an express and implied warranties and negligence, in the construction of a roof for a new high school facility, against the following firms:(a) Matson, Inc., a general contractor, hereinafter called Matson;(b) Ginocchio, Cromwell, Carter and Neyland, Inc., an architectural firm that prepared the plans and specifications for the project, hereafter referred to as Cromwell;(c) Knox Gill Company, a sub-contractor who performed the roofing work…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Louisville Silo & Tank Co. v. ThweattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Ives v. Anderson Engine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. City of Paragould v. International Power MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Lloyd v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Certainteed Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Haase v. StarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. J.R. Simplot Co. v. Chemetics International, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API