Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Zandi

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2017No. 92296-9PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶ 1 This case asks if out-of-network health care costs qualify as “ ‘[u]ninsured medical expenses’ ” under RCW 26.18.170(18)(d). Victor and Deanna Zandi’s dependent daughter, T.Z., incurred approximately $13,000 in medical bills when she had a kidney stone removed while traveling outside the Kaiser Permanente network. The superior court ordered Victor Zandi to pay 75 percent of the cost and Deanna Zandi to pay the remaining 25 percent. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the superior court abused its discretion by modifying the parties’ 2009 order of child support, which required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Matter of Marriage of SteadmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  2. In re Marriage of HaukWashington Supreme Court · 2026
  3. In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey K. Newgard And Pennelopy Ann NewgardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Lamonica Hummel v. Todd HemrickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Leslie Tullis v. Golden TullisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API