Legal Opinion

Clearfield State Bank v. Brimhall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1970No. 11900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a judgment of the lower court, affirming, on review,1 an order of the Financial Institutions Commissioner, approving the proposed establishment of a “unit” bank in Clearfield, Utah. Affirmed.

The proposed Bank of Northern Utah applied for authority to operate a unit bank2 in Clearfield, Utah. The plaintiff here, Clearfield State Bank, is an operator of an existing bank in Clearfield, and protestant here.

Plaintiff says that 1) the applicant, by indirection and subterfuge, is seeking a branch bank for the Bank of Utah in violation of Title 7-3-6, U.C.A.1953, having…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Commerce Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Braeburn Securities Corp. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CENTRAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. BrimhallUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In re Application for Formation of the Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bank of American Fork v. BrimhallUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Clearfield State Bank v. BrimhallUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API