Legal Opinion
Saylor v. Lindsley
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 13, 1967No. 65 Civ. 516PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a stockholder of defendant Tonopah Mining Co. of Nevada, brings this derivative action. He asserts, on behalf of his corporation, claims against its Directors, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. and the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seq. Defendants Lindsley, Stott, Zeckhausen, Northfield Mines, Inc. and Tonopah Mining Co. move for summary judgment, asserting that the claim is barred by res judicata and the statute…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,401 J. Ralph Saylor v. Thayer Lindsley, and Roseanne Horn, Michael J. McLaughlin Objectors-Appellants, and Abraham I. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Saylor v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Saylor v. LindsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Saylor v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Saylor v. BastedoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.