Legal Opinion

Spriggs v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 19, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson

Reversing.

The two appellants and J. C. Spriggs were indicted in the Martin circuit court and found guilty of the offense of operating or assisting in the operation of an illicit or moonshine still, and each fined $300.00 and adjudged to serve ninety days in the county jail. Of the several grounds assigned for a reversal of the judgment it will be necessary for us to consider only two: (1) The sufficiency of the indictment; (2) the competency of the evidence introduced by the Commonwealth.

1. The indictment is charged to be duplicitous. It charges the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Commonwealth v. StringerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Dennison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  4. Roberts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Means v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. ShouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Maier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Potter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API