Legal Opinion

Deutscher v. Lick Fork, Ltd. (In Re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 13, 1983No. Bankruptcy No. 3-83-00372, Adv. No. 3-83-0750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

CLIVE W. BARE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The question before the court is whether a signatory of a note, signing in a representative capacity, may be compelled to answer questions pertaining to the corporation he represented when he executed the note. The signatory, an attorney, asserts that the information sought by the trustee is subject to an attorney-client privilege of both the corporation in question and a named individual. According to the trustee, the attorney-client privilege is inapplicable because the signatory was also the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex. rel. Flowers v. Tennessee Trucking Ass'n Self Insurance Group TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API