Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Texas State Employees Union

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1986No. 14460Published

1DissentBrady, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The majority has overlooked the time-honored rule in Texas that fact findings by the trial judge in a non-jury case, have the same presumption of conclusiveness and weight on appeal as a jury verdict. Vandyke v. Austin Ind. School Dist., 547 S.W.2d 354 (Tex.Civ.App.1977, no writ). It is also the rule that where findings of fact made by the trial court are supported by any evidence of probative force, they must be sustained on appeal. Rankin v. Carpenter, 568 S.W.2d 198 (Tex.Civ.App.1978, no writ). A Court of Appeals cannot substitute its findings for those of the trial *517c…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ray v. Farmers' State Bank of HartTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Vandyke v. Austin Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Talent v. City of AbileneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rankin v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API