International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Barber
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM—DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Chief Judge.
I
The First Amendment is dedicated to the proposition that a citizen’s right to form, hold, or express opinions or beliefs is entitled to an accommodation from the government whenever possible. This principle embodies certain fundamental social decisions about the type of society that would be created as a result. One such decision concerns our society’s attitude towards its discordant voices. Every society seeks, to varying degrees, to manage the forces of social unrest within its borders. The First Amendment envisions a system by which social…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loper v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Nakatomi Investments, Inc. v. City of SchenectadyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- O'MALLEY v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.