United States v. Eichman
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
In these consolidated appeals, we consider whether appellees’ prosecution for burning a United States flag in violation of the Flag Protection Act of 1989 is consistent with the First Amendment. Applying our recent decision in Texas v. Johnson, 491 U. S. 397 (1989), the District Courts held that the Act cannot constitutionally be applied to appellees. We affirm.
I
In No. 89-1433, the United States prosecuted certain appellees for violating the Flag Protection Act of 1989, 103 Stat. 777, 18 U. S. C. § 700 (1988 ed. and Supp. I), by knowingly setting fire to several United States flags on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.