Carle v. Underhill
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
On the probate of the will, a paper alleged to be a codicil, was brought in by certain parties, interested, but not cited, and I directed them to file an allegation propounding it for proof. This having been done, the *104question now arises on the depositions of the witnesses, whether the instrument was executed in conformity to the statute regulating the method of making wills. On the ninth of February, 1854, the testator made his last will and testament, containing various provisions, and appointing executors. On the 25th of June, he signed the following paper, which had been…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re the Estate of WorkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PinkneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
- In re the Probate of the last Will & Testament of BurkeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876
- In re the Will of BuchanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.