Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Plaintiff, a public utility, was permitted to add a surcharge to the cost of its electric service to defray the financing expenses associated with the construction of a new power plant. The regulatory order authorizing the surcharge provided that the amounts collected would be “refunded” to the utility’s customers in the form of reduced rates during the thirty-year period following completion of the plant. The issue in the case—presented here through cross-motions for summary judgment—con*870cems the proper tax treatment of these surcharges.
Plaintiff contends that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois Power Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Iowa Southern Utilities Company and Subsidiary Companies v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Indianapolis Power & Light Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Dominion Resources, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Houston Industries Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Electric Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.