Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of West Virginia v. Belinda Ann Fuller

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2017No. 16-0153Separate

1DissentLoughry, Chief Justice

Ignoring clear statutory language and engaging in a convoluted analysis, the majority of this Court has gone out of its way to manufacture a non-existent ambiguity in the prostitution statute, West Virginia Code § 61—8—5(b) (2014). Moreover, even under the majority’s misguided analysis, there is no justification for an outright dismissal of the petitioner’s indictment. Because the majority has imprudently overstepped its judicial authority and reversed a valid conviction, I am compelled to dissent.

A plain reading of West Virginia Code § 61-8-5 reveals that the statute was designed to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. EpperlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Newhart v. PennybackerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Huffman v. Goals Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brooke B. v. Donald Ray C., IIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API