State of West Virginia v. Belinda Ann Fuller
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentLoughry, Chief Justice
Ignoring clear statutory language and engaging in a convoluted analysis, the majority of this Court has gone out of its way to manufacture a non-existent ambiguity in the prostitution statute, West Virginia Code § 61—8—5(b) (2014). Moreover, even under the majority’s misguided analysis, there is no justification for an outright dismissal of the petitioner’s indictment. Because the majority has imprudently overstepped its judicial authority and reversed a valid conviction, I am compelled to dissent.
A plain reading of West Virginia Code § 61-8-5 reveals that the statute was designed to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. EpperlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
- Newhart v. PennybackerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Huffman v. Goals Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Brooke B. v. Donald Ray C., IIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.