Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1984No. 01-82-0500-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

Following a mistrial which resulted from a hung jury, appellant was retried and convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated rape of a child. At the punishment hearing, the jury found the indictment’s enhancement allegation to be true, and assessed punishment at confinement for 99 years. Two grounds of error are asserted, neither of which requires examination of the facts of the offense.

Appellant’s first ground of error asserts that he has been denied a meaningful appeal because the court reporter’s notes of appellant’s first trial, which resulted in a mistrial,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milburn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Fuentez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
  3. Pedro O. Fuentez, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API