Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. F.D.R. Temple Associates, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 23, 2009Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHOENFELD, J.
Order dated June 28, 2006, affirmed, with $10 costs.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendants’ negligent failure to remove barricades following a sidewalk repair and restoration project. Answering interrogatories, the jury found that both plaintiff and defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York (Con Edison) were negligent, but that their negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident. The jury further found that defendant Co-Star Construction, Inc. was negligent and that its negligence was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Mars Associates, Inc. v. New York City Educational Construction FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vera v. Bielomatik Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Palmer v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dubec v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.