Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Schmidt

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Nicholas M. Pette, J.,

Plaintiff moves for an order requiring defendant and all other persons indicated in his moving affidavit to produce for discovery and inspection, pursuant to section 324 of the Civil Practice Act: (1) all of the defendant’s books, records, memoranda or writings, United States and New York State income tax returns for the years 1957 and 1958, all financial records, including bank statements and records and all other writings and papers kept by him or in his custody or control as relate to the matters in controversy in this action and to the dealings and transactions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lemon v. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Rubel Corp. v. RosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Beasley v. Huntley Estates at Ardsley, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Murphy v. KeenanNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Wertheim v. GrombeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. Forest Hills General HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API