Hammersley & Dyett v. Barker & Chapman
New York Court of Chancery
■ This was an application" on the part of the complainants for leave to dismiss their bill as against' William Chapman without costs. . ■
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainants in this cause filed
their bill to obtain relief against the assignment of a mortgage • and a decretal order of sale thereon, at that time in the hands of Jabob Barker; and which, was an incumbrance on the • manufactory which' formed the ' subject of phe litigation be • ■ tween" them and Chapman in another suit. Chapman was made a party"; and distinct relief was prayed against him, if they did not succeed in obtaining the relief asked for against the other defendants. , The factory has been sold, on the application of these complainants, and against the wishes,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. Holly & JarvisNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Layman v. New York Bank Note Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
- Beebe v. BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Pennell v. WilsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1867
- Pennell v. WilsonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864