Heaton v. Findlay
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In error from tbe Common Pleas of Venango. Tbe following opinion was tbe only paper obtained by tbe reporter, and is believed to contain a correct and sufficiently full statement of tbe facts of the case. It was decided at a previous term.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
From this very imperfect record tbe following summary of facts may, with some labour, .be extracted. Before and in tbe beginning of tbe year 1842, Quigley'& McConnells were tbe owners and occupiers of a certain furnace in Venango county, blown by tbe cast-iron cylinder in dispute, which was affixed to the furnace, and absolutely necessary to its use. On tbe 20th of April, 1842, James McConnell, one of tbe firm of Quigley & McConnells, sold tbe cylinder to Findlay, tbe plaintiff below, who was bail for tbe price of it, to tbe person from whom it bad been purchased. As evidence of this sale, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Powell v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Oves v. OgelsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Payne v. CraftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Morgan v. Arthurs & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Richter v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Berger v. Wood, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1975
- Pearce v. Aldrich Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913