Davis v. Arkansas Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court. David W. Carroee, Chancellor. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. Suit in equity by Arkansas Pire Insurance Company against Zeb Ward, Oscar Davis, and J. P. Joyce & Company to set aside a transfer of cotton alleged to be fraudulent, and to subject said cotton to the satisfaction of plaintiff’s judgment.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court. David W. Carroee, Chancellor. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. Suit in equity by Arkansas Pire Insurance Company against Zeb Ward, Oscar Davis, and J. P. Joyce & Company to set aside a transfer of cotton alleged to be fraudulent, and to subject said cotton to the satisfaction of plaintiff’s judgment. On the 11th day of December, 1893, previous to the commencement of this suit in equity, the Arkansas Pire Insurance Company, brought suit at law against Zeb Ward, one of the defendants to this suit, and afterwards recovered judgment against him for the sum of $5,000.…
1Opinion of the Court
Riddick, J.,
(after stating the facts.) The question before us is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the finding of the chancellor that the transfer of the cotton was fraudulent and void as to the creditors of Ward. The appellee first contends that the decree should- be affirmed, for the reason that Davis showed no interest in the property. But if there was no evidence on this point, this contention could not avail, for the reason that the complaint of appellee alleged that the cotton had been transferred to Davis by Ward, and the object of this suit is to set that transfer aside.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Horstmann v. LaFargueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Davis v. YongeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Stonestreet v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Euclid Avenue National Bank v. JudkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Taylor v. Bank of MulberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.