Legal Opinion
United States v. Hanna
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 26, 1966No. 66-69-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MEHRTENS, District Judge.
The Defendant, Kenneth Herbert Hanna, has been charged with a violation of the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. Section 1343. He and Nathan Modell are also charged with violations of the interstate gambling laws (18 U.S.C. Sections 1084, 1952).
As I view it, all the evidence in this case consists either of tape recordings of telephone conversations between Hanna and Modell, or Hanna and others, which resulted from the monitoring of Hanna’s telephone lines by the telephone company, or evidence seized from Hanna and Modell pursuant to search warrants which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Benanti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Mack S. TaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Charles v. GrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Herman D. Brandon v. United States of America, Sylvester E. Gautreaux, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Frederick PratterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.