Legal Opinion

Dana v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted to the extent of allowing a commission to issue upon written interrogatories on the following matters: 1. That Dr. Crandell was a physician and treated the deceased as a patient, giving the dates and places of treatment. 2. The duration of the treatments. 3. Whether or not at such times Dana was sick and whether or not he was confined to his bed, with the date and duration of each such confinement. 4. The fact of his examination of Dana at or about the time of his death. 5. The fact that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API