Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1894Published

Memorándum.—Proceedings in chancery. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Lorin C. Collins, Judge, presiding. Creditor’s bill; bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction; appeal by complainants. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893.

1Dissent

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary,

dissenting.

I think that so far as relates to the American Oak Leather Company and Julius Schmits, the action of the Circuit Court was correct.

No issue in the suit for a dissolution of the firm of Deimel & Bros, was presented as to their personal liability. The manner in which the supposed judgments or decrees were entered, is stated in the present bill, and is shown to have been that on the coming of the master’s report as to claims proved against the assets under the control of the court,' the court entered these judgments or decrees. No such controversy was ever…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robb v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API