Legal Opinion

Turner v. Astrue

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 13, 2011No. Civil Action 08-391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.

Of all the canons of statutory construction, one of the most well established is the rule that waivers of sovereign immunity must be strictly construed. “[T]he United States, as sovereign, is immune from suit[.]” United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399, 96 S.Ct. 948, 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976). If Congress decides to depart from this “background of complete immunity,” United States v. Shaw, 309 U.S. 495, 502, 60 S.Ct. 659, 84 L.Ed. 888 (1940), and subject taxpayer funds to the expense of legal liability, the conditions and limitations of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. SSADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API