Legal Opinion
People v. Santana-Medrano
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2006No. 04CA2152PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
Defendant, Ezequiel Santana-Medrano, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of sexual assault, a class three felony. We affirm the judgment and remand the case for correction of the mittimus.
Defendant was charged with one count of sexual assault, a class four felony. See § 18-8-402(1)(a), C.R.S.2006. In a separate count, he was charged with causing the victim of the sexual assault to submit by physical force or physical violence, which raises the level of the offense to a class three felony. See § 18-3-402(d4)(a), C.R.S.2006.
Under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Armintrout v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Vega v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. DunawaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garcia v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. HerreraColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. NagiColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. SchefferColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. ScogginsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009