Mabrey v. Dickson

I see no need for us to detail either law or evidence. Code 1940, T. 13, § 66; Frederick v. State, 28 Ala.App. 494, 188 So. 272.

Appellant’s counsel in brief has assigned' error under Assignment No. 1, “For that the Decree 1 of the Court in this cause is contrary to the law,” and under No. 3, “For that the Decree of the Court in this cause is contrary to the law in that the Appellee is a holder of the note made the basis of the suit after maturity and the Appellant should have been allowed to claim all defenses available to him between the maker and payee, State National Bank, a national…