Legal Opinion

American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Pere Marquette R.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 23, 1920No. 5467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. Receivership suit by the American Brake Shoe & Foundry Company against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. Hearing on intervening petition of the Pere Marquette Railway Company against Frank Koscnicki.

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This is an intervening petition filed herein by the Pere Marquette Railway Company, the purchaser of all of ' the assets of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company and of the receivers of the latter company, under the foreclosure sale herein held pursuant to the terms of the decree of sale made and entered January 29, 1917. By the terms of that decree the purchaser at the sale therein ordered was required, as part of the consideration for the property purchased, and in addition to- the sums bid by such puchaser, and elsewhere in the decree required to be paid by it, to take…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hanlon v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1909
  4. Nashville Ry. & Light Co. v. BunnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  5. Thompson v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riehle v. MargoliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. McGreavey v. StrawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  4. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Pere Marquette R.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  5. Bremer v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API