Legal Opinion

President of the Bank of the United States v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1829PublishedCited by 27 opinions

ERROR to the circuu court of Washington county in the district of Columbia. In the circuit court, the plaintiffs, as indorsprs of the bank, of Columbia, instituted this suit against the defendant, as indorser of a promissory note, dated “ Georgetown, May 6tb, 1819,: foi $3700, arawn by Daniel Reintzel, and payable at sixty days" to the order of the? defendant. The note was protested, when^at maturity, by order of the bank of Columbia the holders.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the circuu court of Washington county in the district of Columbia. In the circuit court, the plaintiffs, as indorsprs of the bank, of Columbia, instituted this suit against the defendant, as indorser of a promissory note, dated “ Georgetown, May 6tb, 1819,: foi $3700, arawn by Daniel Reintzel, and payable at sixty days" to the order of the? defendant. The note was protested, when^at maturity, by order of the bank of Columbia the holders. The-plaintiifs gave in evidence the protest of the note, stating, “ that payment thereof had been duly demanded of the maker, on the,third' day of…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr Justice Washing,ton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case, comes up by writ of error -from the circuit court for the district of Columbia and county of Washington.

The, suit was brought by the plaintiffs in error against - the, defendant, as the indorser of a promissory note of Daniel Reintzel for $3700, payable 60 days after date, and-dated , the 6th of May 1819.' The only question in the cause turns upon the sufficiency^ of the notice to the defendant, the circumstances attending which appear in a bill of exceptions taken by the plaintiffs to the opinion of the court. From this it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ireland v. KipNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  2. Ireland v. KipNew York Supreme Court · 1813

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Allen v. KirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  2. Ponder v. MoseleySupreme Court of Florida · 1848
  3. Rolla State Bank v. PezoldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Simmons v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API