Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8226SC1075PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

In his first assignment of error the defendant argues that the court erred in admitting the testimony of two doctors.

Dr. William Guest who examined the defendant testified as follows:

“Q. And as a result of your examination, did you order any laboratory tests be made?

A. Yes, sir, my preliminary diagnosis at this time was either gonorrhea or non-specific urethritis.

Q. Did you give him any treatment?

A. Yes, sir, I did. Following obtainment of two preliminary tests — one was a culture for gonorrhea and the second was ‘VDRL’ which was for syphilis.

Q. Did you have an opportunity to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. KarbasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Ake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API