Legal Opinion

United States v. Freeman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 2011No. 09-4043PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

After a five-week trial, four defendants were convicted of various drug crimes. The district court later found that the government’s star witness had testified falsely, that the government knew this testimony was false, and that the government relied upon it to secure the defendants’ convictions. The district court then granted a new trial, and the government appeals. Because the record fully supports the district court’s findings that the government knowingly used false testimony and that this testimony affected the jury’s verdict, we affirm.

I

For several years, the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Tony SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Wisconsin Right to Life State Political Action Committee v. BarlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Morales v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Brian WilbournCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API