Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Cammack, Squires & West

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1858Published

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of St. Martin, Voorhies, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSrofeord, J.

This is a sequestration sued out by the plaintiff against Cam-mack, Squires & West, as third possessors of the slave Lucinda, upon which the plaintiff claims to have a legal mortgage for the reimbursing of her paraphernal effects, alienated by her husband, George W. Johnston, against whom she has a suit still pending.

Cammack, Squires & West bought the slave from George W. Johnston, who is admitted to have been the owner and possessor; they also acquired possession from him before the sequestration.

The prayer of the petition in the present case is, that these defendants be cited to show cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sellick v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API