Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Sanford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1930No. 40379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The facts in this case, as shown by the record, are that the Iowa Savings Bank of Douds was duly incorporated under the-laws of the State of Iowa and doing a general banking business. The defendant, Drover L. Sanford,. was originally the owner of one share of stock in said bank of the par value of $100, and his name so appeared on the books of the bank. On or about the 14th day of July, 1924, he sold this share of stock, in good faith, to R. C. Cramlet, receiving a valuable consideration therefor. Sanford went to the bank, advised the officers of the bank of the sale, and directed them to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matteson v. DentSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Whitney v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Fort Madison Lumber Co. v. Batavian BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Ottumwa Screen Co. v. StodghillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Perkins v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bates v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Bates v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API