Legal Opinion

Flannery v. People

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1906No. Gen. Nos. 12,883, 12,884, 12,885, 12,886 and 12,887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Contempt proceedings. Writs of error to the Superior Coúrt of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiffs in error will be referred to merely as plaintiffs and defendants in error merely a§ defendants, in this opinion. Before considering the main contention of counsel for plaintiffs, which is that the decree is not warranted by the evidence, we will consider the following objections urged by counsel:

1. The injunction is void, for the reason that the bill states no jurisdictional facts. Counsel argues, in support of this objection, that under the bill the members of the Chicago Typothetae, for and on whose behalf and by whose…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Andrew J. Aikens v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Franklin Union No. 4 v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API