Legal Opinion

Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of Commerce

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1941No. 26167. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Murphy

This is a direct appeal from an order of the superior court of Cook county entered in a consolidated suit prosecuted for the purpose of enforcing the constitutional liability of the stockholders of the Chicago Bank of Commerce. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal which was taken with the case and since it presents a jurisdictional question it will be given first consideration.

Appellant claims that part of section 11 of the Banking act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, chap. 16½, par. 11,) which provides : “Said receiver shall have authority upon the order of the court appointing him to employ…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Griveau v. South Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Jones v. HorromIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People Ex Rel. Worth v. City of WaukeganIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clarke v. StorchakIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Jenisek v. RiggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Continental Paper Grading Co. v. Howard T. Fisher & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Seno v. FrankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Lutkus v. Department of FinanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API