Gossett v. Seggerman

(after stating the case as above).

Appellant first asserts the undisputed facts and circumstances in evidence show conclusively as a matter of law that Seggerman was the owner of the ten shares of stock of the bank appearing in his name at the time the bank was closed, wherefore the implied finding of the court to the contrary cannot be sustained; and in any event such finding is so contrary to the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly wrong, and should be set aside.

This contention cannot be sustained. The evidence speaks for itself, and abundantly supports…