City of New York v. Kalikow Realty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On June 27, 1972, the City Department of Highways placed a violation on defendant’s premises, stating that the abutting sidewalk was in need of repair. (New York City Charter former § 230 provided that if a property owner failed to cure a violation the City could then make the required repairs at the owner’s expense.) Defendant responded to the City’s notice by letter dated July 10, 1972, as follows:
"We have erected a fence and repaired the sidewalk so as to be in a safe condition. We intend to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- 17 Vista Fee Associates v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Chadis v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- St. Jacques v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claypool v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.