Legal Opinion

Kaniku v. Monsarrat

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

Having fully considered this case, we hereby affirm and adopt the reasoning of Mr. Justice McCully in his decision, rendered on the 10th of February last.

W. C. Achi, et al., for plaintiff. A. Rosa, for defendant.

Decision op McCülly, J., Appealed From.

The plaintiff having recovered, according to his claim for land, but without award of damages, the defendant files his motion for a new trial on sundry statute grounds. The plaintiff’s counsel contends that the motion should not be entertained by the Court, as not having been perfected as the statute and rules…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murray v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API